Final Night at the DNC - Kamala Harris Accepts 2024 Presidential Nomination

In partnership with

Texans at the DNC

Texas Democrats’ key policy positions at this year’s Democratic National Convention were immigration reform, healthcare, and the mobilization of Latino voters.

Key Moments:

• Colin Allred, the Democratic US Senate candidate against US Senate Ted Cruz, publicly endorsed Kamala Harris for the 2024 presidential race, praising her leadership and commitment to progressive values. He stated, "Kamala Harris is the leader we need to bring our country together and move it forward. I’m proud to stand with her as she fights for every American." 

• Congresswoman Veronica Escobar delivered a speech on the need for comprehensive immigration reform, highlighting the unique challenges faced by border communities. She emphasized that “immigration is not just a border issue, it’s a human issue,” calling for humane policies that respect the dignity of all individuals.

• Congressman Joaquin Castro focused on the importance of voter mobilization, particularly among the Latino community, which he described as "the future of Texas and the Democratic Party." Castro highlighted the strides made in increasing voter turnout in recent elections but stressed the need for continued efforts to engage young and minority voters.

• Beto O’Rourke, former U.S. Rep and 2020 presidential candidate, spoke about healthcare, reiterating his call for expanding Medicaid in Texas, which has not adopted the expansion under the Affordable Care Act. O'Rourke argued that “every Texan deserves access to affordable healthcare.”

Cruz vs. Allred Neck and Neck in Texas Senate Race?

The Senate race between Republican incumbent Sen. Ted Cruz and Democratic challenger Colin Allred is thin. Cruz holds a slight lead with 46.6% of likely voters compared to Allred's 44.5%, while Libertarian candidate Ted Brown captures 2.5%, leaving 6.4% undecided. This data comes from the August survey conducted by the Hobby School of Public Affairs at the University of Houston, in collaboration with Texas Southern University, which focused on 1,365 likely voters with a margin of error of 2.65%. Gender and racial divides are stark: Cruz leads Allred by 13 points among men (52% to 39%), but Allred is ahead by 7 points among women (49% to 42%). Among white Texans, 57% support Cruz, while Allred leads among Latino and Black voters with 46% and 72% respectively. With 93% of voters on both sides certain of their choice, this race will likely hinge on undecided voters and turnout among key demographics.

Read the report

Trump and Harris Face Off in Texas Voter Showdown

That same poll shows Texas voters with a clear but narrow preference for Donald Trump over Kamala Harris. Trump leads with 49.5% of likely voters, while Harris trails at 44.6%. The August survey, which focused on 1,365 likely voters with a margin of error of 2.65%, reveals that Harris's support has increased by 4.3 points since June, while Trump’s has edged up by 0.6 points. The gender gap is significant: Trump has an 18-point lead among men (56% to 38%), but Harris leads among women by 6 points (50% to 44%). Racial divides are also pronounced—57% of white Texans back Trump, while Harris has overwhelming support among Black Texans (77% to 17%). Among Latino voters, the race is tight, with 47% for Trump and 46% for Harris. Both candidates retain strong loyalty from their bases, but independent voters remain a wildcard, with 41% leaning toward Trump and 39% toward Harris.

Read the report

Texas Takes on Big Tech with Social Media Law

The Texas social media safety law, often referred to as HB 20 from the 87th Texas Legislative Session - 1st special, has become a flashpoint in the ongoing debate over free speech and content moderation in the digital age. HB 20 is aimed at curbing what the state perceives as censorship by social media companies. However, the law has faced numerous legal challenges, culminating in a significant court case that could have broad implications for the future of online speech and state-level regulation.

Bill Analysis

Key Provisions of HB 20:

• Content Moderation Restrictions: The law prohibits large social media platforms (those with over 50 million active users in the U.S.) from banning or blocking users based on their viewpoints. This section of the law (Chapter 143A of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code) has been the most contentious, as it directly challenges the content moderation practices of tech giants like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.

• Transparency Requirements: HB 20 mandates that social media companies disclose how they moderate content, including how they handle complaints and the criteria used for content removal or user bans. This requirement aims to increase accountability and transparency in how platforms enforce their community guidelines.

• Appeal Process: The law establishes a process for users to appeal content removal or account suspensions, requiring companies to provide clear reasons for their decisions and offer a way for users to challenge those actions.

Legal Challenges and Court Case:

• The law was immediately challenged by tech companies and free speech advocates, who argue that HB 20 violates the First Amendment by compelling platforms to host speech they may find objectionable. Critics also contend that the law is overly broad and could lead to unintended consequences, such as the proliferation of harmful content online.

• In a recent court case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld parts of the law, allowing certain provisions to take effect while leaving others in limbo. The decision has been appealed, and the case could eventually reach the Supreme Court, setting a national precedent.

Impacted Sections of Texas Code:

• Chapter 143A, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code: This chapter, created by HB 20, outlines the restrictions on content moderation and the transparency requirements for social media platforms. It is at the heart of the legal challenges, with opponents arguing that it infringes on the platforms’ rights to manage their services according to their terms.

National Impact:

• The outcome of the legal battle over HB 20 could influence similar legislation in other states. States like Florida have passed comparable laws, which are also being challenged in courts, making the Texas case a critical test for state-level regulation of social media.

What’s Next?

• As the case progresses through the courts, both sides are preparing for what could be a landmark decision. If upheld, HB 20 could dramatically alter the landscape of content moderation, forcing platforms to reconsider how they manage speech on their services. The law’s supporters argue it is necessary to protect free speech online, while opponents warn it could lead to a flood of harmful or extremist content.

Quote of the Day

“Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.” - Theodore Roosevelt

We hope you enjoyed today’s read.

Stay connected with TXLege on X @TXLege_

Find what you need in committee hearings, floor debates, and state agency meetings faster with USLege - say goodbye to tedious tasks!

News Is Better Without The Bias

📰 Meet your new anti-bias task force with Unspun Updates. We help you identify and eliminate bias from your media and decision-making. Use 💡 OPPORTUNITY FINDER to uncover financial gems, 📊 SECTOR ANALYSIS to assess unbiased news impacts, and 🧠 WHY ARE THEY HIDING IT? to understand bias psychology. Test your skills with CAN YOU SPOT IT?, explore bias costs in WHAT’S THE COST?, get stock picks with STOCK IT TO ME, and find strategies with NON-TRADITIONAL MOVES TO MAKE.

📰 Yes - Filter out the bias!